The Didache

I grew up surrounded by the reading and teaching of the Christian Bible. I was taught from birth that it was the Word of God and thus should be central to our life practice. I thought I knew everything about the Bible, even memorizing whole books for Bible Quizzing (yes, Bible Quizzing). Then one day, I learned that the books of the Bible were chosen by a group of men in a process called canonization.

What!?!

No one ever told me how the books came to be, just that God wrote them using the hands of men (why he/she didn’t use women, I never asked?) Neither was I informed about the significant disagreement among the canonizers as to which books should be included and whether large swaths such as the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) should be included in the bible at all. Finally, I learned that different sects of Christianity call different books sacred with different Bibles for Catholics, Orthodox, and Protestant communities.

This was the first step on a road that de-deified the Christian Bible in my eyes. Fortunately, it certainly has not made that book lose its significance in my life. In fact, I find more beauty in the narrative of the Christian story as illustrated in the Old and New Testaments, than when I was memorizing verse by verse. Another benefit has come from the ability to find sacredness in other texts, particularly those of the early church which did not make the cut. While some of these are spurious, many of these text have added rich value to my faith and helped me understand the early church to a larger extent than the Gospels or Acts can accomplish.

My favorite of these texts is The Didache. This ancient writing is considered one of the earliest documents of the church and presents a framework for how Christians and Christian Communities should act with each other. If you’re never read it, you can see a translation here or here.

The central premise of the Didache is an outline of The Two Ways. We are presented with the Way of Life and the Way of Death. The Way of Life is described using Jesus’ own words, reminding us that life is found in loving our enemies, practicing generosity, and avoiding excess desires. The Way of Death is a reminder to flee from evil by avoiding a standard list of evils. While the latter parts of The Didache focus on ceremonial rites like baptism and communion, this discussion of the ways is what I find most significant.

I love this writing because Jesus’ Way is more important than Jesus as THE way. While the canonical “Gospels” are rich in both narrative and teaching, they often are read to prove that Jesus is the mystical Son of God and that anyone who doesn’t get on the Jesus bandwagon obviously isn’t down with God. Too often, the actuality of what Jesus taught is abandoned and replaced with misinterpretation of the teaching of the Apostle Paul. This leaves behind a community of faith which loves Jesus, but doesn’t know what he taught.

The Way of Life and the Way of Death present to us a better framework for understand the way of God in the world than the “salvation from eternal hell” idea. We live in a world of choice, in which we have alternatives with different consequences. The power of the moment comes to play as the choices I make don’t effect my eternal destiny as much as they move me closer to one of two alternatives. In this scenario, our whole lives come into to play. Things which are life-producing: spiritual practice, care for the environment, healthy lifestyles, and love for neighbor are the Way of Life, while the opposites: selfishness, prejudice, greedy consumption, and exclusion of the other lead us to death. Could this be what Jesus was talking about when he spoke of the narrow and the wide gates? I believe so.

The Didache serves to ground us in the framework of what we’re about as people who try to follow God in the way of Jesus. Much as faith communities today develop statements of faith or common values, the Didache gives us a picture into what the early Christians were thinking about. In my reading, it seems that they were a lot less concerned about proclaiming Jesus as God and singing songs of worship than they were about living out the Way of Life in a world addicted to death. Give it a read and tell me what YOU think?

Your email:  
Subscribe Unsubscribe  

permalinkRead More CommentComments (1) CatSpirituality/Theology

One Response to “The Didache”

  1. Jillian Says:

    I printed out the Didache and read it on my bus ride to work the other day. I admit, I haven’t put a lot of effort into completely over-analyzing it, but here are my thoughts (since you asked!)

    I.5 - “…but he who receives it without need shall be tried as to why he took and for what, and being in prison he shall be examined as to his deeds, and ‘he shall not come out thence until he pay the last farthing.’”

    My initial reaction to this was that it’s not very Christ-like in attitude, but would probably fix the welfare system in America. Moving on….

    II.7 - “Thou shalt hate no man; but some thou shalt reprove, and for some shalt thou pray, and some thou shalt love more than thine own life.”

    Some? Which ones? This would seem to imply that some people are more worthy of our love than others. I may be starting to see why this didn’t make it into the Bible.

    III.2 “Be not … passionate, for from all these murders are engendered.”

    Not passionate?!? Why not? Where’s the fun in life then? (I’m halfway kidding… I know my exuberant nature tends to get me in trouble. That’s actually probably good advice, but I had to argue with it to make myself feel better.)

    VII.1 “Let not your fasts be with the hypocrites ….”

    Maybe I’m getting too cynical for my young age, but I think everyone can be hypocritical at times. If I take this literally, I shouldn’t fellowship with anyone because they’re all hypocrites, right? That verse just seems a tad judgmental. There’s probably a historical context to put it in, but I don’t know what it is.

    X.5 “Thy Church”

    Although I agree with you that the Didache is less exclusionary than most scripture, this implies that God has a favorite church. It’s capitalized even. Favorite Church. And so the arrogance begins….

    XI.2 “But if the teacher himself be perverted and teach another doctrine to destroy these things, do not listen to him, but if his teaching be for the increase of righteousness and knowledge of the Lord, receive him as the Lord.”

    This is my favorite verse out of the whole thing. Although there are people who would see the magic words “teach another doctrine” and stop reading, puff up their chests, and go along their merry way in giddy self-righteousness, I see the whole verse. In my opinion, this leaves the playing field open for other smart people to come along later and teach the same message of hope, love, compassion, etc. Perhaps Jesus wasn’t the only smart person who ever lived, eh? Anywho…

    XI.6 “…but if he ask for money, he is a false prophet.”

    Whoa!! What does that say about the church today?!?!? And the Christian music industry? And the Christian bookstore chains? And the fiction books about the end times? Hold up! That can’t be!!! (That’s thick sarcasm, for those of you who can’t tell.)

    XI.7 “Do not test or examine any prophet who is speaking in a spirit, ‘for every sin shall be forgiven, but this sin shall not be forgiven.’”

    I’m pretty sure that wasn’t what the unforgivable sin was. I thought it was blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. I could be wrong. This implies not to question someone speaking in an evil spirit. I believe in those too. Again, that might have been why it didn’t make it to the Bible.

    XV.3 “…nor let him hear a word from you until he repents.”

    That’s pretty harsh. Is that really the sort of love Jesus came to teach? (Or Buddha, or whoever…)

    Overall, a very good read. Thought provoking (as you can see above). I agree that it’s a lot less arrogant than a lot of Christian texts, but I don’t agree with everything that’s in there.

    Your thoughts?

Leave a Reply

CSS Template by RamblingSoul | Tomodachi theme by Theme Lab and Online Marketing